On Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:34 AM, I wrote: > On Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:44 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Adrian Bateman wrote: > > > Tony Ross has picked up this action. It's closely related to planning > > > work he has already started. We intend to send a proposal to the > > > working group before the end of September. I believe a status of OPEN > > > is appropriate given that we are actively working on this issue. If > > > the group prefers to close the action and set the status of the issue > > > to raised until we submit that feedback we wouldn't object to that > > either. > > > > The action can be OPEN and the issue status can be RAISED. I believe > > that that would effectively represent the current status, per the > > definition of RAISED: > > > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/#head- > > 47c0b55d661dcf93f76d586ddbe292c9abc597e4 > > > > Not being familiar with Tony Ross, if you are OK with it, I would > > prefer to keep the action assigned to you (Adrian). > > I'm okay with both of those. Tony has written up our thoughts on Distributed (or Decentralized) Extensibility in the attached HTML document. Tony is on vacation so I am posting on his behalf. We have included a base proposal with several optional components. The purpose of this document is to seed a discussion and we expect the discussion to drive improvements in the document. Regards, Adrian.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:44 GMT