W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: ISSUE-81 (resource vs representation)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:18:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0909281917200.21884@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > 
> > RFC2616's terminology is more abstract than is useful for most Web 
> > developers, and therefore this kind of terminology confuses people.
> 
> Can you provide evidence to back your claim? I am specifically referring 
> to your claim about confusion caused by "resource" as "a thing that 
> sends bits upon request".

No, unfortunately, as noted earlier in this thread, I have no conclusive 
evidence either way.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 19:10:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:08 UTC