W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: ACTION-137 on URI/IRI/URL

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:29:57 -0700
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <D6AF1B7B-28C4-4763-BAC6-8DF643281A40@apple.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>

Hi Larry,

Thanks for the update. And in particular, I'd like to thank you for  
hopping on to IRC to discuss the issues. Even though these discussions  
got a bit heated at times, I found them useful and I feel that we  
gained understanding of each other's perspectives.

Regards,
Maciej

On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:

> Updated in tracker, but thought I would send in email:
>
> 2009-09-24 13:25:32: I did create another draft which I posted
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0854.html
>
> However, this didn't address all HTML WG comments as promised,  
> although I'd made some good progress. The main "issue" (which led to  
> splitting this out in the first place) is to come up with a way of  
> resolving conflicts between IETF and W3C specs and what browsers  
> actually do (see section 12 of above document.)
>
> Subsequently (and after some discussions with Maciej and Hixie on  
> IRC chat and discussions at TAG meeting now ongoing), I expect to be  
> able to produce another document in the next few days. (Updating due  
> date to 9/28).
>
> In the meanwhile, I'm trying to schedule IETF work to get IETF  
> approval of this approach to URI/IRI/etc. An IETF working group may  
> be necessary to get other IETF working groups (IDNA, HTTP, mailto  
> URI) to pay attention. [Larry Masinter]
>
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net
>
Received on Friday, 25 September 2009 01:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:48 GMT