W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: itemheader names <h>

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:17:55 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0909221517k1f1da42x64cbb60c73a12387@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
> But as long as we're thinking generic instead of figure-specific,
> maybe the answer is a simple <h>.  Because of h1-h6, the meaning
> should be more obvious than it is with most short tags; because of the
> rejection of <h> to replace h1-h6, it is still available.

I am absolutely certain that you will see <h> rampantly misused to replace <h*>.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 22:18:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:48 GMT