W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

RE: <keygen> element

From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:34:45 +0000
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <104E6B5B6535E849970CDFBB1C5216EB0D66C0@TK5EX14MBXC138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> 
On Monday, September 14, 2009 2:43 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> That sounds reasonable to me, especially in light of the parsing and
> form.elements aspects. Those details could cause interoperability
> problems even for content that's willing to use a different approach
> for IE. What's the Microsoft opinion on this?

We're reviewing the recent mail on <keygen>. I've also got some references to the web service protocols that we have published and are moving to with many of our CA customers/partners. I will respond early next week.

Regards,

Adrian.
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 05:37:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:48 GMT