W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: how many URL issues do we need/want?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:15:22 +0200
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uz2djwue64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:06:04 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:14 +0000, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> [...]
>>> 2. New issues this week
>>> a) Topic ISSUE 78: Spec should use a term other than "URL" for Web  
>>> Addresses
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/78
>>
>> I suggest closing that as a dup of issue-56
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56
>
> I think it's somewhat useful to track the naming issue from the issue of  
> what to reference, since we could resolve those independently and at  
> separate times.

For this part of the specification it is actually somewhat annoying that  
it has been splitted out. The alternate iri-bis draft that is available  
does not match what used to be in the draft (in a bad way) and updates are  
slow.

I resorted to using  
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-html5-20090423/infrastructure.html#urls but I  
doubt no fixes have been made since then.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 23:16:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:48 GMT