W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:23:34 +0300
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0258FA43-80FA-4E8E-A4EB-9EE89867B972@iki.fi>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On Sep 2, 2009, at 00:07, Manu Sporny wrote:

> http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html


Section 2 doesn't say if it's normative or informative. It looks  
informative.

In section 4.1, I suggest referring to the HTML5 rules for determining  
the language of a node.

The last paragraph of 4.1 confuses DOCTYPE and MIME type.

Section 4.2 talks about well-formed XML, but XMLLiterals are generally  
not well-formed (i.e. they aren't guaranteed to have a single root).

Section 4.2 should probably require the Coercion to Infoset rules be  
applied prior to applying the serialization algorithm.

Please clarify what 4.3 intends to say in terms of DOM Level 2 or the  
Infoset.

Please clarify what 5.2 means for processors that expose the content  
of a text/html document using a non-DOM API view to the Infoset (e.g.  
XOM).

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 07:24:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:48 GMT