W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Review comments on HTML+RDFa (was Re: FPWD Review Request: HTML+RDFa)

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:26:11 -0400
Message-ID: <4A9DF3E3.1020404@digitalbazaar.com>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> The HTML+RDFa profile points to the XHTML Vocabulary document [1], which
> defines link types whose semantics contradicts the semantics currently
> in the HTML 5 draft - see Bug 7475. [2]

Right. This needs to be resolved.

> (*) You probably want to update the HTML5+RDFa draft with *more* points
> that needs to change in HTML 5. Namely, you should add that HTML 5 needs
> to change to support the XHTML Vocab profile[1].
> (*) Either that, or you should be clearer about the effect of adding the
> profile link - including the effect of not linking to it.

We'll discuss both options. I've noted your comments here:


-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Pirate Bay and Building an Equitable Culture
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 04:26:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:51 UTC