Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> ...
>> Somebody once said: "the optimal number of optional features in a spec 
>> is zero", and "you're done with a spec when there's nothing left to 
>> remove" (maybe it way Yaron G.).
>>
>> Of course that doesn't always work well, but there's a lot of truth in 
>> it. But: if we're really concerned with the size of the spec than 
>> there are far bigger parts that could be removed.
> 
> I think the concern is more about the size of the platform. I.e. 
> splitting a feature into its own specification does not really qualify.
 > ...

Both are concerns.

BR, Julian