W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Proposal to publish HTML5 and vocab specs

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:26:38 +0100
Message-ID: <4AE7F22E.2050508@gmx.de>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> Let's be clear.  What Julian was stating was that we had affirmed RDFa 
> in HTML.  I simply stated that the level of affirmation (i.e., Working 
> Draft) was precisely the same for RDFa in HTML as it was for Microdata. 
>  It still is possible that neither of them will make it to CR.  Or both 
> of them.  Or just one.
> ...

I still disagree on that. Microdata was put into the spec based on a 
unilaterally decision of the editor. The WG failed to get it removed 
before publishing a WD, true, but that's not quite the same thing as 
having made a conscious decision to include it.

> ...

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 07:27:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:51 GMT