Jonas Sicking wrote: > ... > In short, the same benefit you get from removing any redundant > feature. The question should never be "why not have this feature in > the spec", the question should always be "why should we have this > feature in the spec". > ... Somebody once said: "the optimal number of optional features in a spec is zero", and "you're done with a spec when there's nothing left to remove" (maybe it way Yaron G.). Of course that doesn't always work well, but there's a lot of truth in it. But: if we're really concerned with the size of the spec than there are far bigger parts that could be removed. BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 07:17:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:23:00 GMT