On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Tony Ross wrote: > > Given some of the comments in this thread, I'd like to step back and try > to get consensus on the core problem. Specifically I want to know > whether or not the group feels providing some sort of a solution for > decentralized extensibility, in particular decentralized extensibility > of markup, is important. > > In short, should HTML 5 provide an explicit means for others to define > custom elements and attributes within HTML markup? This is putting the cart before the horse. Before deciding whether we want a solution, we need to establish whether we have a problem. We shouldn't be discussing whether or not people should be able to create proprietary (but validating) HTML elements until we have a problem for which that is a reasonable solution. > If we cannot agree on the problem, then debating the technical details > of a potential solution is pointless. Exactly. But decentralized extensibility is not a problem. It's a class of solutions. Is there a problem? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 22:06:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:49 GMT