Re: typeof document.all

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Brendan Eich wrote:
> 
> Please open your eyes to this relevant factoid, and take it into account 
> in where you work to specify fully, since you cannot specify everything 
> that might matter fully in any bounded amount of time, and you agree 
> that things like GC cycles are more important and currently 
> underserved..

I've spent far more time specifying GC stuff than document.all. Actually I 
spent very little time (an afternoon?) specifying document.all to the 
point where I was happy that it was fully specified and compatible with 
legacy content. It wasn't that difficult.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 00:44:23 UTC