W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Infinite loop? (was HTML Working Group Decision Policy - for discussion)

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:35:21 -0400
Message-ID: <4AD368D9.8020200@digitalbazaar.com>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> Laura Carlson wrote:
>> Will having no ending step that directly implements the working
>> group's decision be problematic?
> 
> It will be problematic if it ever occurs. From my conversations with Ian
> and Manu (our current editors of active normative drafts), I believe
> each of them would follow a formal Working Group decision, so I do not
> expect this to come up.

I would certainly respect any formal Working Group decision made by the
HTML WG.

Even in the most contentious case, if I were to refuse to change spec
language after a formal WG decision, I'd expect another WG member to
step forward and change the language (since all spec source files are
available).

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Pirate Bay and Building an Equitable Culture
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/08/30/equitable-culture/
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 17:35:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:09 UTC