- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:22:39 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > > My hope remains that we settle on MIT. If the W3C and WHATWG can't come > to an agreement on a license, then we will need to revisit this -- but > then again, we will need to revisit a lot of assumptions, so I would > recommend that we cross that bridge when we get to it. I assume you mean "If the W3C and the HTMLWG participants can't come to an agreement...", not "W3C and WHATWG"; I'm unaware of any W3C/WHATWG communication on the subject. As far as I'm aware, it's only an internal HTMLWG issue regarding the licensing of the HTMLWG deliverables. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 09:12:56 UTC