W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2009

Re: CfC: Adopt Proposed Decision Policy

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:16:11 -0800
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <AA9D85DE-6352-4420-A5B8-B85633B767EA@apple.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>

I'll post proposed text for this clarification soon.

  - Maciej

On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:

> This is a request for clarification, not an objection.
>
> As I explained last week during the HTML f2f, the W3C Advisroy Board
> noticed that it's unclear how one goes to object to a decision of the
> editor if the original commenter agreed with the editor's response  
> (step
> 5.a and even 5.b). You suggested that the policy should be updated to
> clarify that anyone, not just the original commenter, is authorized to
> escalate the process. I suggested that they can either escalate or
> reopen a bug instead.
>
> Philippe
>
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 02:33 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> There's been a fair amount of discussion about the Decision  
>> Policy[1],
>> and we've already starting putting parts of it into practice. After
>> consulting with my co-Chairs, we believe it is time to formally
>> propose the policy for adoption by the group. Specifically:
>>
>> ** RESOLUTION: HTML Working Group to adopt the proposed Decision
>> Policy at http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision- 
>> policy.html
>> **
>>
>> Note: this doesn't mean this policy is locked in forever. The Chairs
>> are committed to reviewing the policy and making adjustments as we  
>> go.
>>
>> f you object to this resolution, please indicate your objection by
>> Tuesday, November 10, 2009(*). If you object, please give a reason.  
>> It
>> doesn't have to be a very good reason, but it should be a reason that
>> you believe in. If there are no objections by the stated date, this
>> resolution will become a Working Group Decision by unanimous consent.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
>> * - I'm making the period for objections longer than the customary
>> week to give people some time before and after TPAC to give their  
>> input.
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 17:16:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:10 UTC