Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> ACTION-103 in relation to the about: URI scheme registration is >> currently assigned to me and due today. I've sent feedback to Joseph >> about the current draft, which needs a number of changes. However, I >> haven't heard back yet. So I will change the due date for this action to >> next week, when I will hopefully have more to report on the issue. > > Joseph responded today, having made most of the changes I suggested to > him. The last remaining issue was to do with fixing up section 5 for > defining how to resolve about URIs and reserving about:blank. > > The current editor's draft is here. > > http://github.com/josephholsten/about-uri-scheme/blob/master/draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-03.txt > > > The revised text I've suggested for section 5 is as follows: > ... Sounds reasonable. However, I'd recommend not to use RFC 2119 keywords for statements about other specifications. Speaking of which: is there an E.T.A. for a new draft? Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 19 November 2009 14:42:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:23:08 GMT