- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:32:39 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > ... > I've been trying to figure out where exactly the disagreement between us > lies, but I think we can all agree on the following: > > 1. There are applications that have the need and/or desire to implement > non-draconian error recovery for documents created with the > intention of being XML, but for whatever reason are not well-formed. > > 2. In order to achieve interoperability among such applications, it is > necessary to have a specification that clearly defines how to parse > documents intended to be XML and recover from any fatal errors. > ... For the record, I do not support 1), thus also not 2). BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 13:33:17 UTC