- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:52:43 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:49:35 -0800, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: >> As this is something that I see us doing again, and without further >> discussing what was said previously, can we agree on a simple factual >> statement that we accompany such responses going forward, such as: >> >> "These comments were collected and reviewed by the working group, but >> were not formally assessed for consensus." > > The problem in this meeting was that we did not even know that the HTML > WG made those comments and what the contents of the comments were. I > think most people in the room hadn't had a chance yet to look at the > comments but they were already submitted to the Math WG on behalf of the > HTML WG. It was quite confusing. ...furthermore, when we started to discuss this, Joe, who would have been able to provide some insight into what was going on, wasn't in the room yet (and we didn't realize until later that he participated in generating the feedback). So apologies for the confusion, in particular to the MathML people. BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 7 November 2009 16:53:36 UTC