> I am disappointed that one of the co-chairs of this group > degenerated > my effort to the Math WG at the TPAC meeting this week [1]. Ooh, I didn't notice or hear about it when I was there. Now reading the rest of the posts, I can see a point. Thanks Again, Shelley, Best Regards, Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com> To: "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 5:07 PM Subject: the MathML comments > There is no procedure in place when it comes to how we comment to > other groups. I was operating under a deadline, which I needed to > meet, because I have another task deadline, also for this group, > also > before November 11th. As it was, I also put the comments out for > review, and modified the comments accordingly. > > I'm sorry that some members of this group were disappointed with the > comments we developed for MathML, and that I went ahead and sent the > comments to the Math WG. I would like to remind this group that no > one > was willing to step forward to do any comments before I and Joe > volunteered. > > I am disappointed that one of the co-chairs of this group > degenerated > my effort to the Math WG at the TPAC meeting this week [1]. > > Shelley > > [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20091107#l-21 >Received on Saturday, 7 November 2009 11:02:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:52 GMT