- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:04:24 +0100
- To: Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>
- CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
Jeremy wrote: > Leif wrote: >> Ian hasn't lifted a finger to make rel=profile a valid keyword. > > The process for adding rel values isn't run by Ian. See bottom of this letter. > Anyone can propose > rel values but the proposal must then go through either the > microformats in order to be accepted or be part of a W3C spec: > > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions The rules for how to add rel keywords are not fixed until the draft has become a standard. In fact, there is an alternative process/co-process going on. [1] > Some proposals for new rel values were showing up recently in Bugzilla > and I've been trying to point people to that wiki instead. I had noticed that. But IMHO you were then acting prematurely. Amongst other things for the reasons I mentioned above. > Existing work on a rel="profile" proposal can be found here: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-profile The subject of this thread is the rel="profile" specification [2], which has had to be authored outside the HTML 5 spec. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06 [2] http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-epb -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 23:05:00 UTC