W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:52:08 -0400
Message-ID: <4A1ECF48.9000205@intertwingly.net>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net 
> <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Shelley Powers wrote:
> 
> 
>         On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren
>         <annevk@opera.com <mailto:annevk@opera.com>
>         <mailto:annevk@opera.com <mailto:annevk@opera.com>>> wrote:
> 
>            On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:18:11 +0200, Shelley Powers
>            <shelley.just@gmail.com <mailto:shelley.just@gmail.com>
>         <mailto:shelley.just@gmail.com <mailto:shelley.just@gmail.com>>>
>         wrote:
>             > In fact, that's my biggest concern: that discussions
>         should occur
>             > directly between RDFa and HTML5 folks are not happening,
>            happening offline, or
>             > snarkily, in IRC (
>             >
>          
>          http://lastweekinhtml5.blogspot.com/2009/05/rdfa-guys-wake-up-and-smell-pilgrims.html).
> 
>            What do you mean? At least Sam Ruby and Philip Taylor are
>         debating
>            the technical issues with the RDFa crowd right on this
>         mailing list.
> 
>         I meant exactly what I said: it would have been helpful to have
>         folks who have implemented RDFa libraries in JS participating,
>         because they will have the best understanding of the issues.
>         That's not a condemnation of the folks, just an observation that
>         the discussion isn't as inclusive as it need be.
> 
>     The most I can do is make *this* place hospitable.  If there are
>     issues that are preventing others from participating here, I ask
>     that Chris and I be informed as to what these issues (either on-list
>     or off-list) are and I am committed to resolving them.
> 
>     I hope that the folks that have implemented RDFa libraries in JS do
>     chose to participate when they are ready.
> 
>     - Sam Ruby
> 
> Actually Sam, these emails are cross posting between RDFa in XHTML TF 
> and the HTML WG. My wistful hope was directed more as a hint to the 
> folks on the RDFa side. I can understand if they choose not to 
> participate. I'll be disappointed, but I can understand.
> 
> My other comments were directed more at the HTML WG et al side, but 
> saying them will solve nothing. People will act directly, and 
> positively, or they won't.

I wasn't going to comment on it, but since you have been pushing it: I 
would like to hold everybody to the same standard.

"incorporating a negative emotional tone in a writing can be an eff, 
even pos, tool"

http://twitter.com/burningbird/status/1848643851

"Or you could be like me, and slather it on, like bar-b-que sauce on a 
roasting pig. The sweet, spicy kind."

http://twitter.com/burningbird/status/1851027745

The most I can do is make *this* place hospitable.  Yes, people will be 
snarky at times.  I simply ask that they do so elsewhere.  On that note, 
I have no quibble with you.

> Shelley

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 17:58:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:03 UTC