W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:10:08 -0400
Message-ID: <4A1EC570.6000502@intertwingly.net>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com 
> <mailto:annevk@opera.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:18:11 +0200, Shelley Powers
>     <shelley.just@gmail.com <mailto:shelley.just@gmail.com>> wrote:
>      > In fact, that's my biggest concern: that discussions should occur
>      > directly between RDFa and HTML5 folks are not happening,
>     happening offline, or
>      > snarkily, in IRC (
>      >
>     http://lastweekinhtml5.blogspot.com/2009/05/rdfa-guys-wake-up-and-smell-pilgrims.html).
> 
>     What do you mean? At least Sam Ruby and Philip Taylor are debating
>     the technical issues with the RDFa crowd right on this mailing list.
> 
> I meant exactly what I said: it would have been helpful to have folks 
> who have implemented RDFa libraries in JS participating, because they 
> will have the best understanding of the issues. That's not a 
> condemnation of the folks, just an observation that the discussion isn't 
> as inclusive as it need be.

The most I can do is make *this* place hospitable.  If there are issues 
that are preventing others from participating here, I ask that Chris and 
I be informed as to what these issues (either on-list or off-list) are 
and I am committed to resolving them.

I hope that the folks that have implemented RDFa libraries in JS do 
chose to participate when they are ready.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 17:11:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:37 GMT