Larry Masinter wrote: > I was talking specifically about the question of whether > image.width and image.height are simultaneously available, > and the assertion that because some authors might depend on > it Not might, do. If it were a might, the situation might have been somewhat different. > the specification needed to require implementations > to make them available Right. Implementations that want to correctly render existing webpages need to do this. > and the inconsistency of that requirement > with asynchronous processing. Yep. Sad, but true. There are all sorts of requirements imposed on UAs and hence on the spec by legacy content; this is one of them. -BorisReceived on Thursday, 28 May 2009 01:13:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:33 GMT