W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2009

Re: HTML interpreter vs. HTML user agent

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:23:43 -0700
Message-ID: <63df84f0905270923lc571581wd5a22d2dd856bb5e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
> However, there has been strong push back that the
> specification being reviewed should be applicable
> to all kinds of HTML interpreters, and not just
> HTML User Agents.

>From who? Do you have examples of this?

Note that I think some people, me included, use the term "User Agent"
when they mean what you call "HTML interpreter". So it might have
simply been a matter of using different vocabularies, not a matter of
wanting to target the spec at different audiences.

/ Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 16:24:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:37 GMT