- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:05:38 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 24 May 2009 08:30:35 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: ... > Hmm. The original document was published as a Working Draft on track to > become a W3C Note by a lopsided vote of the Working Group in favor. If > we are going to reverse that decision and decide not to ever publish it > as a Note, then I think we need something more than informal discussion > on a conference call. > > So, I would object to publishing a version that says the group has no > plans to take the document further, until and unless we have clear > consensus on that point. Quite right. And that version should actually be a Note (as Larry noted elsewhere). But I don't see a lot of purpose in chasing down consensus on this, since I think any consensus reached will be based on weaselling into things that evryone agrees with because it supports the interpretation they think is the right one. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Sunday, 24 May 2009 17:06:28 UTC