Re: minutes: HTML WG Weekly 21 May 2009 [draft]

>> I think the flaw identified in the document should be fixed, even if it
>> remains a Working Draft. Would anyone like to make an argument for not
>> fixing it? Or for doing something other than my proposed remedy?
>
> I don't see ay reason not to fix it, but given the nature of the document,
> it might be even easier to publish a new version that simply has a changed
> status, clarifying that the group has no plan to take this any further...

I tend to agree with Chaals.

I've suggested text for a disclaimer [1].

Best Regards,
Laura

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0170.html
-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Saturday, 23 May 2009 21:19:36 UTC