On Sun, 10 May 2009, Ben Adida wrote: > > In addition, this proposal *specifically* conflicts with RDFa by reusing > RDFa attributes (i.e. @property) with a different interpretation. In > other words, of all possible approaches to the problem, the HTML5 group > chose an approach that specifically conflicts with the only other > existing W3C spec for the given use cases. I think this may be a W3C > first. > > I absolutely cannot live with that. > > I note, as a side point, that it's fairly clear this conflict was by > design (since it was said that @property is "borrowed from RDFa"). In > other words, whereas typical W3C groups go out of their way to prevent > conflict with other specs, this group is currently actively creating > conflict. I've renamed the property="" attribute to itemprop="". -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 23:22:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:35 GMT