- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Some comments on > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-timers.html > from a collegue: > > * The specification should put non-zero contraint on the return value of > the methods. Scripts use if(handle) to check if something was returned. Done. > * It should mention that UAs need to have a lower limit, probably 10ms, > for Web compatibility. If that's not feasible it should at least allow a > lower limit. Done. > * It should mention that the timeout given can't always be honoured > exactly (apart from the lower limit), because of clock resolution, CPU > load, other JS threads, etc. Done. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 06:11:32 UTC