- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:31:25 -0500
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Yes, we intend for them to be more or less the same in terms of syntax and > functionality. What specifically did you have in mind? The biggest one I could think of is being able to specify a feed for a given SVG document: <svg...> <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Some feed" href="http://www.example.com/feed.atom" /> </svg> But of course there are many other relationships that would make sense (author, timesheet, etc). Would there be any restriction on where the <link> elements can exist? Children of <defs>? Anywhere in the document? Regards, Jeff
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 20:32:01 UTC