W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2009

Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:53:39 +0000
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bmybcyvks.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian wrote:

> Doug wrote:
> . . .
>> * Ideally, the SVG WG would like the HTML tokenizer to be 
>> case-preserving for attribute and element names.

> My understanding is that doing this would introduce an unacceptable 
> performance penalty for implementations.

So, I'm perplexed.

All the browsers I'm familiar with (I haven't installed Chrome yet)
support XML+XSLT via the xml-stylesheet processing instruction.

So they all have case-preserving tokenizers whose performance is
acceptable for the people who serve and read XML+XSLT.

Who then has ruled that a case-preserving tokenizer "imposes an
unacceptable performance penalty", and on the basis of what evidence?

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJx8yjkjnJixAXWBoRAqeWAJ9gRd7hnL5v2ghOCNOq71pu9Q8OvACfWBrU
KkG5lcxPc/i0Y6YmGJSVfbE=
=5pDG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 17:54:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:02 UTC