Re: View Source

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:32:18 +0100, G. Wade Johnson <gwadej@anomaly.org>  
wrote:
> So, again, if SVG is currently defined as XML, why would a current tool
> read something that is not well-formed XML.

A current tool wouldn't, but a patched current tool would. And it would do  
that because it's relatively cheap to support and allows authors to import  
SVG embedded in HTML.


> I'm sorry if this comes off as confrontational. But, I've spent a lot
> of time cleaning up crap that was supposed to be XML (and HTML) that was
> passed off with the comment "Why not just change your parser?"

A fair comment, I'd say :-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/