- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:13:28 +0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > No, I am certainly opposed : when I say "view source", that > is exactly what I mean; if there were an option "view > DOM serialisation", I could envisage uses for it, but > the two are as different as chalk and cheese. Whilst I think there is a need for both modes, there is a long historic precedent for view source not showing the true source, e.g. Netscape showed the output from load time document.write's, not the original source. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 08:14:19 UTC