Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

Julian Reschke wrote:
> The transformation *result* is RDF data. It doesn't tell you how to
> interpret parts of the source.

No, sorry, I believe that's *exactly* what it tells you. When you're
writing HTML with GRDDL (or with eRDF, which has the same indirection
property), you're saying "this is how to interpret my value of @rel."

Put another way: if you're willing to mistakenly interpret rel="foobar"
the same way in two documents that have different GRDDL transformations
(same GRDDL profile), then you can misinterpret the RDFa, too. Fine by
me. What's the difference?

-Ben