- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:50:39 -0500
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Le 1 mars 2009 à 09:54, Henri Sivonen a écrit : > Now, to put an actual technical proposal in here: > > I suggest changing RDFa to use full IRIs instead of CURIEs. Then, > suggest making it a conformance requirement for rel in both text/ > html and application/xhtml+xml that a rel token MUST NOT contain a > colon or MUST be an absolute IRI and MUST NOT start with the string "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/ > ". Authors SHOULD NOT mint relation IRIs that differ only in case. After discussing with henri this [morning (EST) on IRC][1], a possible solution for solving the issue without creating too much hurdles for authors and spec would be to use urn. urn:dc:title is a URI and as henri mentioned, "one could register a URI scheme for dc". The same way creative commons could register urn:cc. I understand that we loose a bit of the flexibility of namespaces by choosing whatever prefix you want, BUT in the deployed markup, I have the feeling (survey?), that people are using the same prefix values. That would avoid also long uris in the rel value which would be burdensome for authors, and templates authors. [1]: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20090301#l-83 -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 15:51:06 UTC