- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, robert@ocallahan.org, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > Per the current rules that would give the same result as a bogus media > > > type though. I.e. lack of Content-Type does not give you the right to > > > start sniffing for <video> / <audio>. > > > > This doesn't appear to be the case with the way the spec is phrased now. Can > > you confirm that this problem is now fixed? > > I would be glad to, if I could find the right things to read. The HTML5 draft > has MIME sniffing removed and replaced with the [MIMESNIFF] reference (not > defined anywhere that I can see). The MIME sniffing section should hopefully be irrelevant in this case; does the video section refer to it somehow? If so I should fix that. > Or is the relevant text somewhere in the > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#concept-media-load-resource > section? That is the relevant algorith, yes; specifically the second and third cases in the first set of cases in the list in step 3. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 21:41:30 UTC