W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:51:10 -0700
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Philip TAYLOR <p.taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-id: <485C85E9-502D-4973-BEFC-2556AE5CB3D2@apple.com>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>

On Jun 24, 2009, at 3:19 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:

> Hi Ian
> The original email from laura was about modifying the HTML 5 design
> principles, whether or not individual players have been adhering to
> the spirit or intention of the modifications is neither here nor
> there.
>
> The current thread does not address the merits of the proposed
> wording, which that should be what the debate is about.
>
> besides, if you feel you have been acting in accordance with the
> suggested text, then there should be no issue with it no?

I agree, let's keep this thread to the merits of the proposed wording  
changes, instead of about what the group is or isn't actually doing.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 18:51:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:38 GMT