W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Request to Strengthen the HTML5 Accessibility Design Principle

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:57:29 -0500
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0906240457m291eca0xd056e6962747da4e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>, Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Philip TAYLOR <p.taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Steve wrote:

> The original email from laura was about modifying the HTML 5 design
> principles, whether or not individual players have been adhering to
> the spirit or intention of the modifications is neither here nor
> there.


> The current thread does not address the merits of the proposed
> wording, which that should be what the debate is about.

Thoughts anyone?

> besides, if you [Ian] feel you have been acting in accordance with the
> suggested text, then there should be no issue with it no?

Is there anyone who cannot live with the proposed wording?

Best Regards,

Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 11:58:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:47 UTC