Re: &foo= in attribute values (and why defining conformance matters)

On 6/12/09 6:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, John Foliot wrote:
>    
>> I pose a serious question: what is the real benefit of making unescaped
>> ampersands non-conformant? (Of making anything "non-conformant"?)
>>      
>
> It defines what QA tools like conformance checkers should highlight as
> problems, as an aid to authors who wish to catch mistakes they did not
> intend. That's it.
>    

That's called a lint tool. You don't understand what MUST means.

- Rob