On 6/9/09 6:02 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > Why reference the Mozilla API? I'm assuming because it drives the > Mozilla editor, as well as the browser, which puts the API into the > conforming author territory, while still being part of a user agent. > That's a good point. Just more fallout from the ridiculous author conformance requirements. Pseudo-intellectual ideas about "semantic markup" just don't buy you that much as requirements. Like anything else, some HTML files are better crafted than others, but conformance requirements should address showstoppers. - RobReceived on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 22:13:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:34 GMT