- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:28:39 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Jun 2, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Status of the Design Principles in this document is not binary. > They aren't all 100% successful or 100% abject failure. The point > of view that states that they must be in exactly one category or the > other is counter productive. > > I saw the original email on this subject as representing significant > progress. But, yes, you have the leeway to ignore the feedback of > myself and others that felt that incorporating the essence of that > email into the document itself would make that document more useful. I intend to take into account your feedback that it's useful to evaluate the usefulness of individual principles now that we have more experience with them. Probably not by making the specific change you suggested, but likely it will be conveyed in the document in some way. Incidentally, I don't have direct feedback from anyone but you to the effect that including the lists of more successful and less successful principles directly would be a good idea. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 03:29:17 UTC