Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies" (ACTION-123)

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> Ian Hickson has closed the action with the comment:
> 
> > 2009-05-29 18:28:27: Discussed here:
> > 
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0207.html
> > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019833.html
> > [Ian Hickson]
> 
> I have re-opened the action item; my understanding is that we close them 
> during the telco after review.

Marked it "pending review". Please do not open action items on me without 
my agreement.


> That being said; I don't think the arguments given in these mails are 
> convincing, and I'd *really* like to see an answer to the points I 
> raised over here.

Your e-mails are in the queue of things I have to get to. This message, 
for instance:

   http://www.w3.org/mid/4A0AB46E.9000204@gmx.de

...is e-mail 425 of 735 in my current list of e-mails to reply to, and is 
but one of many e-mails on the topic.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 08:38:44 UTC