W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies" (ACTION-123)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:40:54 +0200
Message-ID: <4A24D786.1050101@gmx.de>
To: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:08:34 +0200, Julian Reschke 
>> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> I note there was no feedback on this. Does silence mean agreement here?
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Sam, Chris,
>>>
>>> there hasn't been any feedback since (*); I think at this point this 
>>> should added to the WG Tracker... -- should I do that?
>>
>> FWIW, I do not think that lack of response should be taken as 
>> agreement here. As Sam said:
>>
>>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warnocked
> 
> Yes, I was tempted to cite that proactively...
> 
> Anyway, I was proposing to *track* it there, that's it.
> ...

Ian Hickson has closed the action with the comment:

> 2009-05-29 18:28:27: Discussed here:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0207.html
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019833.html [Ian Hickson]

I have re-opened the action item; my understanding is that we close them 
during the telco after review.

That being said; I don't think the arguments given in these mails are 
convincing, and I'd *really* like to see an answer to the points I 
raised over here.

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 07:41:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:38 GMT