- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:03:47 -0400
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Sam Ruby wrote: > Given the number of objections, I don't believe that they can all be > resolved by Monday, so here are the options I have heard so far. > > 1) Publish Ian's draft as is, along with the HTML 5 differences > from HTML 4. [SR] > 3) Publish Ian's draft, the HTML 5 differences from HTML 4, and > Mike's draft. [LM, JF1] > 4) Instruct Mike Smith to work with Ian to incorporate [text to > be provided by John Foliot] into Ian's draft [JF2] Unless I'm misreading, the number of poll options have gone from 5 to 3 (I very much like the direction this is taking!). I base this on the following emails (people are welcome to correct me if I got this wrong)... Dropping 2: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0938.html Dropping 5: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0940.html At this time, I will state my preference, which is that Mike and John follow Manu's lead (the first link above). - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 22:04:46 UTC