- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:17:32 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
I think I'm not going to be able to make the HTML working group phone conference 7/30 morning -- I'm at the IETF meeting and the IRI/IDN "bar bof" is scheduled in such a way that I can't both be on the HTML working group phone call and also chair the IRI discussion. I think my concerns and the nature of my objection to publication of a new working draft of the current variation have been misrepresented, and I would ask that if there is going be a discussion it be scheduled for next week when I can defend myself. On the other hand, this is a process and not a substantive issue, and I don't think consensus is required, whether "lazy" or explicit. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#Votes "A group may also vote to make a process decision...." I think I've made my point, and I'm willing to work in some other way to address the difficulties I see with applying ordinary W3C process mechanisms to the unprecedented management of the HTML working group. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 08:18:19 UTC