Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio>

On 7/2/09 11:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> Mozilla is also trying to force their preferred solution via the spec, 

The W3C process will be followed. Are you suggesting otherwise?

> without actually resolving the underlying issues. 

The underlying issue seems to be that no one can prove a negative 
regarding patent claims. I don't expect there will be meaningful 
advances in proving negatives.

"are you sure there are no hamburgers on the moon? have you looked under 
every rock?"
> Easy for you to say - Mozilla is much less likely to get sued than 
> vendors with deeper pockets.

Never utter this kind of garbage in the group again. No one should 
tolerate this stuff from an MPEG-LA member.

- Rob

Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 03:39:39 UTC