W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: consensus (was: Codecs for <video> and <audio>)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:38:39 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830907012338t653b45a1pb06bd7f3f94b704@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
SHOULD is better than specifying nothing because it gives confidence
in a selection that was made by the working group. But it's just
nothing that can be relied on.

So I conder: is SHOULD good enough? If we want a useful baseline codec
we probably have to make it a requirement.

Regards,
Silvia.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Michael A. Puls II<shadow2531@gmail.com> wrote:
> We haven't voted on anything in ages. How bout we vote on whether or not we
> want a SHOULD level for Vorbis for <audio> at least?
>
> And, if not now, at some time, let's vote on whether or not we want a SHOULD
> level for Theora for <video>.
>
> --
> Michael
>
>
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 06:39:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:04 UTC