Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience]

Sam Ruby wrote:
> Second, Rob volunteered to take a stab at a simple declarative paragraph
> which he would propose to be included in the status of Mike's draft.
> Such paragraph would include mention about the lack of consensus at this
> point on the normative status, and a mention of an intent for this
> document to follow the Design Principles that this work group had
> previously established.
>    

Here is the proposed text, as promised:

"This document does not represent consensus in the HTML WG. In 
particular, some WG members do not support normative status for this 
document, and thus do not support its advance on the Recommendation 
track. Discussions about the normative status of this document are 
ongoing, and no decision has been taken yet. Like all documents produced 
by the HTML WG, this document will use the design approach described in 
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/">HTML Design 
Principles</a>."

- Rob

Received on Saturday, 31 January 2009 00:50:37 UTC