- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:25:09 +0000
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Is HTML5 mark up spec http://shrinkster.com/13zy useful compared to >> the fullblown spec http://shrinkster.com/13zz use #html5ml in reply > > The survey is biased, because it is asking individuals without > context to compare the utility of an initial draft of a document, > against one document that has been under preparation for years, > and implies that only the former would be produced rather than > both. > > If you were going to do a survey, you might ask something like: > > "Would you like the opportunity to review the utility of a > having a mark up spec (initial draft http://shrinkster.com/13zy ) > as a separate document from a fullblown specification > such as http://shrinkster.com/13zz. In fairness, the wording was probably dictated more by the 140 chars that Twitter allows than any attempt to bias or mislead. (your revised version is 217 chars)... P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:27:10 UTC