- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:12:30 +0100
- To: Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Joseph A Holsten wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Julian, > Everything sounds fine, some questions inline. > > Julian Reschke wrote: >> - on the front page, note where feedback should go (IMHO the best >> place would be the IETF uri-review mailing list) > I haven't seen any other draft do this, so I'm unsure of where should > this go. Abstract? uri-review sounds fine. Too bad the place is a spam Example: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-05> (so after the Abstract). > haven: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review AFAIK, only the archive is being spammed (and somebody is working on fixing this). > ... >> - "About URIs are always escaped, as per [RFC3986]" - that's kind of >> misleading; either remove it, or clarify what you mean by that. > tag URI (RFC4151) says "In the interests of tractability to humans, tags > SHOULD NOT be minted with percent-encoded parts. However, the tag > syntax does allow percent-encoded characters in the "pchar" elements". > Will that do? Yes. I'd just relax the "SHOULD NOT" to something like "is discouraged". > ... BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:13:17 UTC